尼塞韦单抗预防婴儿RSV感染有效性和安全性的系统评价:一项Meta分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R725.6 R978.7

基金项目:

郑州市医学重点(培育)学科(儿科药学)(2023ZZSZDXK02);河南省科技攻关项目(252102311123)


Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of nirsevimab in preventing respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants: a Meta-analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 系统评价尼塞韦单抗预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染的有效性和安全性。方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网(CNKI)和万方等数据库,以及中、美两国临床试验注册平台中关于尼塞韦单抗预防婴儿RSV感染的相关临床试验,检索时限为建库至2024年12月31日。根据纳入与排除标准筛选文献,提取纳入文献信息,采用Cochrane风险偏倚评估工具对纳入的研究进行质量评价。结果 共纳入5项随机对照研究。数据分析显示,与安慰剂/空白对照组相比,在RSV流行季前接种尼塞维单抗可降低婴儿RSV相关下呼吸道感染的风险(RR=0.24,95%CI:0.17~0.34,P<0.01)及RSV感染相关住院风险(RR=0.20,95%CI:0.13~0.30,P<0.01)。此外,尼塞韦单抗组患儿所有不良事件(RR=1.04,95%CI:0.96~1.12,P=0.37)、药物相关不良事件(RR=0.93,95%CI:0.52~1.67,P=0.82)、导致死亡的不良事件(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.07~12.88,P=0.97)、严重不良事件(RR=0.91,95%CI:0.63~1.30,P=0.59)和特殊关注的不良事件(RR=1.29,95%CI:0.43~3.82,P=0.65)方面与安慰剂/空白对照组相比,差异均无统计学意义。与帕利珠单抗相比,尼塞韦单抗的有效性(RR=0.83,95%CI:0.20~3.43,P=0.79)和安全性方面[死亡:RR=2.48,95%CI(0.29~21.10),P=0.41;严重不良事件:RR=1.04,95%CI(0.73~1.50),P=0.82]均未见明显差异。结论 尼塞维单抗在预防RSV感染及降低住院率方面安全性良好,展现出较好的应用前景。

    Abstract:

    Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nirsevimab in preventing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants. Methods Clinical trials related to the prevention of RSV infection by using nirsevimab in infants were systematically retrieved from database such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang, as well as Chinese and American Clinical Trial Registry platforms, the search period was from the establishment of the databases to December 31, 2024. Literatures were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, the included information of literatures were extracted, and the quality of included studies was evaluated by Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Results A total of 5 randomized controlled studies were included in analysis. Data analysis showed that compared with placebo/blank control group, vaccination of nirsevimab before the RSV epidemic season could reduce the risk of RSV-related lower respiratory tract infection (RR=0.24, 95%CI: 0.17-0.34, P<0.01) and RSV infection-related hospitalization risk (RR=0.20, 95%CI: 0.13-0.30, P<0.01) in infants. In addition, compared with placebo/blank control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of all adverse events (RR=1.04, 95%CI: 0.96-1.12, P=0.37), drug-related adverse events (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.52-1.67, P=0.82), death-leading adverse events (RR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.07-12.88, P=0.97), severe adverse events (RR=0.91, 95%CI: 0.63-1.30, P=0.59), and special concerned adverse events (RR=1.29, 95%CI: 0.43-3.82, P=0.65) in infants in niresvimab treatment group. Compared with palivizumab, nirsevimab showed no significant differences in terms of efficacy (RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.20-3.43, P=0.79) and safety (mortality: RR=2.48, 95%CI[0.29-21.10], P=0.41; serious adverse events: RR=1.04, 95%CI[0.73-1.50], P=0.82). Conclusion Nirsevimab has good safety in preventing RSV infection and reducing hospitalization rates, demonstrating promising application prospects.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

陶兴茹,王瑞丽,段彦彦,等.尼塞韦单抗预防婴儿RSV感染有效性和安全性的系统评价:一项Meta分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2026,25(3):372-378. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20262846.
TAO Xingru, WANG Ruili, DUAN Yanyan, et al. Systematic review on the efficacy and safety of nirsevimab in preventing respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2026,25(3):372-378. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20262846.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 摘要阅读次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-04
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-27
  • 出版日期: 2026-03-28