2种不同清洗方法对复杂器械的清洗效果比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

程礼萍

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R187

基金项目:


Comparison between cleaning efficacy of complex medical instruments by two different cleaning methods
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的探讨复杂医疗器械的有效清洗方法,提高清洗质量,保证灭菌效果,控制医院感染。方法选择供应室回收的中度污染器械500件,分为观察组和对照组,每组齿类器械150件,管腔器械100件。观察组采用手工配合多酶超声机清洗,对照组采用流动水手工清洗,比较2组清洗后的洁净度合格率和隐血试验阳性率。结果观察组清洗后齿类器械和管腔类器械的洁净度合格率分别为98.67%和98.00%,隐血试验阳性率分别为0.67%和1.00%;对照组清洗后齿类器械和管腔类器械的洁净度合格率分别为78.67%和70.00%,隐血试验阳性率分别为28.67%和34.00%;上述指标,观察组与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01),即观察组均明显优于对照组。结论复杂的医疗器械,采用手工与多酶超声机清洗效果理想,提高了清洗质量。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effective cleaning methods for complex medical instruments, improve the cleaning quality, ensure sterilization effect, and control nosocomial infection . MethodsFive hundred pieces of moderately contaminated medical instruments recycled from central sterile supply department were divided into two groups, each group included 150 pieces of sawshaped instruments and 100 pieces of lumen instruments; Observation group performed hand washing and multienzyme ultrasound machine cleaning method, control group adopted hand washing with flowing water, the cleanliness and positive rates of occult blood test (OBT)of two groups after cleaning were compared .ResultsThe qualified rate of cleanliness of sawshaped and lumen instruments after cleaning in observation group was 98.67% and 98.00% respectively, the positive rate of OBT was 0.67% and 1.00% respectively; The cleanliness of sawshaped and lumen instruments after cleaning in control groups was 78.67% and 70.00% respectively, the positive rate of OBT was 28.67% and 34.00% respectively (P<0.01); The efficacy of cleaning method in observation group was obviously superior to that in control group. ConclusionCombination of hand and multienzyme ultrasonic cleaning can improve the cleaning quality of complex medical instruments.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

程礼萍.2种不同清洗方法对复杂器械的清洗效果比较[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2011,10(3):214-216.
CHENG Liping. Comparison between cleaning efficacy of complex medical instruments by two different cleaning methods[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2011,10(3):214-216.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-02-16
  • 最后修改日期:2011-03-29
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2011-05-30
  • 出版日期: