空气消毒机消毒效果的Meta分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王丽

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R187

基金项目:


Metaanalysis on disinfectant efficacy of  air disinfector
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的评价空气消毒机与常规紫外线灯空气消毒效果。方法对国内相关文献进行搜索,并按Cochrane 协作网提供的RevMan 5.3软件进行定量分析,比较2种不同空气消毒方法的消毒效果。结果共11篇文献符合纳入标准。因纳入文献存在异质性,故采用随机效应模型分析,两种方法消毒前[WMD=-26.28,95%CI为(-60.31,7.75),P>0.05]和消毒后即刻[WMD=22.45,95%CI为(-34.24,79.13),P>0.05]菌落数比较,差异均无统计学意义,空气消毒机组消毒后2 h菌落数明显少于紫外线灯组[WMD=-345.11,95%CI为(-478.28,-211.94),P<0.05]。结论空气消毒机持续效果较好。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo evaluate disinfectant efficacy of air disinfector and  ultraviolet  lamp.MethodsDomestic literatures were searched by computer, RevMan 5.3 software provided by the Cochrane collaboration  was used for quantitative analysis,  efficacy of two kinds of air disinfection methods was compared. ResultsA total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Because the heterogeneity of literatures, random effects model analysis was adopted,  colony forming unit (CFU) before disinfection(WMD=-26.28,95%CI:[-60.31,7.75],P>0.05 )and immediatelyafter disinfection(WMD=22.45,95%CI:[-34.24,79.13],P>0.05) had no obvious difference between two methods respectively,  but CFU of air disinfector 2 hours after disinfection  was significantly less than ultraviolet lamp group(WMD=-345.11,95%CI:[-478.28,-211.94],P<0.05).ConclusionAir disinfector has good continuous disinfection efficacy.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

刘丽华,宋晓,王丽.空气消毒机消毒效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2015,14(7):450-454. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2015.07.005.
LIU Lihua, SONG Xiao, WANG Li. Metaanalysis on disinfectant efficacy of  air disinfector[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2015,14(7):450-454. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2015.07.005.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-12
  • 最后修改日期:2015-03-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-07-30
  • 出版日期: