最大化无菌屏障在预防导管相关血流感染中的作用
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

段美丽

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R181.3+2

基金项目:


Role of maximal sterile barrier precaution on preventing catheterrelated bloodstream infection
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:


    [摘要]目的了解重症医学科病房深静脉、动脉插管患者采用最大化无菌屏障,对预防导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)的作用。方法2011年9月—2014年4月回顾性收集北京友谊医院重症医学科深静脉、动脉插管患者996例,根据患者是否实行最大化无菌屏障,分为标准无菌屏障组(SSB组,2011年9月—2012年12月,560人次)和最大化无菌屏障组(MSB组,2013年1月—2014年4月,436人次),比较两组患者CRBSI发生情况、病死率等。结果SSB和MSB组患者插管部位构成比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=6.750,P=0.08)。SSB组CRBSI发生率为2.41‰(1.64‰~4.02‰),MSB组为1.91‰(0‰~4.56‰),经秩和检验比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.057,P>0.05);SSB组发生CRBSI 24例(4.29%),MSB组发生CRBSI 26例(5.96%),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.447,P>0.05)。SSB组病死率为(18.43±5.53)%,MSB组病死率为(11.68±4.14)%,经独立样本t检验,差异有统计学意义(t=3.907,P<0.05)。结论最大化无菌屏障未减少CRBSI的发生。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of maximal sterile barrier precaution during deep venous/arterial catheterization on preventing catheterrelated bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in patients in the department of critical care medicine. Methods996 patients who were hospitalized in Beijing Friendship Hospital and underwent deep venous/arterial catheterization from September 2011 to April 2014 were analyzed retrospectively, patients were divided into standard sterile barrier precaution group (SSB group, September 2011December 2012, n=560) and maximal sterile barrier precaution group (MSB group, January 2013April 2014, n=436) based on whether they received maximal sterile barrier precaution, incidence of CRBSI and mortality were compared between two groups. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in constitute of intubation sites between patients in SSB group and MSB group(χ2=6.750,P=0.08). The incidence of CRBSI per 1 000 catheter days in SSB group and MSB group were 2.41‰(1.64‰-4.02‰)and 1.91‰(0‰-4.56‰)respectively,rank test revealed no significant difference(Z=-0.057,P>0.05);24 (4.29%)patients in SSB group and 26(5.96%) patients in MSB group developed CRBSI, difference between two groups was not statistically significant(χ2=1.447,P>0.05). The mortality in SSB group and MSB group were (18.43±5.53)% and (11.68±4.14)% respectively,independent sample ttest revealed that difference was significant(t=3.907,P<0.05). ConclusionMaximal sterile barrier precaution did not reduce the incidence of CRBSI.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

董磊,刘壮,段美丽,等.最大化无菌屏障在预防导管相关血流感染中的作用[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2017,16(7):627-630. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2017.07.008.
DONG Lei, LIU Zhuang, DUAN Meili, et al. Role of maximal sterile barrier precaution on preventing catheterrelated bloodstream infection[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2017,16(7):627-630. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2017.07.008.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-15
  • 最后修改日期:2016-11-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-07-20
  • 出版日期: