全国医疗机构病区环境消毒现况调查与分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李六亿

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R197.323

基金项目:


Current situation of environmental disinfection in medical institutions in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 了解本国医疗机构环境消毒的实施情况,为 《医疗机构消毒技术规范》WS/T 367—2012的贯彻落实与修订提供科学依据。方法 采取多阶段分层抽样的方法,抽取全国6个省份共168所医疗机构,由其医疗机构感染管理专职人员调查填写,并网络上报其普通病区和重点部门空气与物体表面消毒方式、频次及消毒效果监测情况。结果 共163所医疗机构参与调查,其中2所医疗机构未开设普通病区。75所(46.58%)医疗机构对普通病区进行空气消毒,其中42所(56.00%)医疗机构采用紫外线灯照射进行消毒,31所(41.33%)医疗机构只在终末或必要时消毒;98所(60.87%)医疗机构对普通病区物体表面定期进行消毒,其中 94所(95.92%)医疗机构每天消毒1~2次;73所(45.34%)医疗机构对普通病区进行环境消毒效果监测,其中47所(64.38%)医疗机构每季度至少监测1次。141所(86.50%)医疗机构对重点部门空气进行消毒,其中122所(86.52%)每天消毒2次;163所(100%)医疗机构均对重点部门物体表面进行消毒,其中134所(82.21%)每天消毒≥2次;161所(98.77%)医疗机构定期对重点部门进行环境消毒效果监测,其中111所(68.94%)医疗机构为每季度监测1次。结论 《医疗机构消毒技术规范》WS/T 367—2012的颁布促进了各级医疗机构环境清洁与消毒工作,但医疗机构对普通病区存在消毒与监测过度与不足并存的现象,需进一步改进。

    Abstract:

    Objective To understand the implementation of environmental disinfection in medical institutions(MIs) in China, provide scientific basis for the implementation and revision of Regulation of disinfection technique in healthcare settings (WS/T 367-2012). Methods By multi-stage stratified sampling method, 168 MIs in 6 pro-vinces were selected, monitoring results of disinfection mode, frequency and efficacy of air and object surface in general wards and high risk departments were surveyed, filled and reported on internet by full-time staff of infection management in MIs. Results A total of 163 MIs participated in the survey, 2 of which didn't open general wards. 75 (46.58%) MIs disinfected air in general wards, 42 (56.00%) disinfected with ultraviolet light, 31 (41.33%) only performed terminal disinfection or disinfected when necessary, 98 (60.87%) regularly disinfected object surface in general wards, 94 (95.92%) disinfected once or twice a day; 73 (45.34%) MIs monitored the effect of environmental disinfection in general wards, 47 (64.38%) of which monitored at least once per quarter. 141 (86.50%) MIs disinfected air in high risk departments, 122 (86.52%) of which disinfected twice a day; 163 (100%) MIs disinfected object surface of high risk departments, 134 (82.21%) of which disinfected at least twice a day; 161 (98.77%) MIs regularly monitored the effect of environmental disinfection in high risk departments, 111 (68.94%) of which monitored once a quarter. Conclusion The issuing of Regulation of disinfection technique in healthcare settings (WS/T 367-2012) has promoted the environmental cleaning and disinfection in all levels of MIs, but the phenomenon of excessive and insufficient disinfection and monitoring of general wards exists in MIs, which needs further improvement.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

姚希, 巩玉秀, 张宇,等.全国医疗机构病区环境消毒现况调查与分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2020,19(6):553-558. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20205762.
YAO Xi, GONG Yu-xiu, ZHANG Yu, et al. Current situation of environmental disinfection in medical institutions in China[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2020,19(6):553-558. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20205762.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-03
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-06-28
  • 出版日期: