厢式电梯通风方式对咳嗽飞沫核扩散的影响及风险分析
作者:
作者单位:

武汉科技大学资源与环境工程学院, 湖北 武汉 430081

作者简介:

通讯作者:

梅丹  E-mail: meidan@wust.edu.cn

中图分类号:

R183

基金项目:

湖北省中央引导地方科技发展专项(2020ZYYD019)


Impact and risk of ventilation modes of elevator on the diffusion of cough droplet nuclei
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 在新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情背景下,探讨不同通风方式对轿厢式电梯内人员咳嗽飞沫核扩散的影响。方法 基于计算流体力学气固两相流原理,采用Realizable k-ε紊流模型和颗粒轨道模型研究轿厢式电梯内人员咳嗽产生的飞沫核在10 s内的扩散过程,比较三种电梯顶部送风(后部、两侧以及四角通风方式)下的气流速度变化、飞沫核扩散特征以及浓度分布,分析人员风险。结果 10 s内,后部及两侧通风情况下,气流速度旋涡数逐渐减少,四角逐渐增加;后部通风时飞沫核随气流呈现倒"S "型轨迹运动,两侧通风时飞沫核随气流上下运动,四角通风则呈现" C"型轨迹。经过10 s,通风量的增加可以快速将飞沫核浓度减少90%。结论 飞沫释放者对立面为接触携带病菌飞沫核的高风险区。四角通风能够快速稀释整体飞沫核浓度,但飞沫释放者斜对立面人员在该方式下感染风险增加,在增加通风量的同时,还应考虑通风位置,降低人员感染风险。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the effect of different ventilation modes on the diffusion of person's cough droplet nuclei in the elevator under the background of coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. Methods Based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) gas-solid two-phase flow, Realizable K-ε turbulence model and particle trajectory model were used to study the diffusion process of droplet nuclei generated by person's cough in the elevator within 10 seconds, airflow velocity variation, droplet nuclei diffusion characteristics and concentration distribution of three kinds of ventilation at elevator top (the rear, both sides and four corners ventilation) were compared, risk on person was analyzed. Results Within 10 seconds, the number of airflow velocity vortex gradually decreased under the condition of ventilation at the rear and both sides, while increased when ventilation was at the four corners; droplet nuclei moved with the airflow in an inverted "S" shape trajectory when ventilation was at the rear, droplet nuclei moved up and down with the airflow when ventilation was at both sides, droplet nuclei presented a "C" shape trajectory when ventilation was at four corner. After 10 seconds, the increase of ventilation could quickly reduce the droplet nuclei concentration by 90%. Conclusion The opposite side of the droplet releaser is the high-risk area of contacting with the bacteria-carrying droplet nuclei. Although four corner ventilation can quickly dilute the overall droplet nuclear concentration, risk of infection can be increased if there is droplet releaser who is at the oblique opposite. Ventilation site should also be considered when ventilation volume increases, so as to reduce the risk of personnel infection.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

梅丹,王晨霞,李佳倩,等.厢式电梯通风方式对咳嗽飞沫核扩散的影响及风险分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2022,(1):8-14. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20228305.
Dan MEI, Chen-xia WANG, Jia-qian LI, et al. Impact and risk of ventilation modes of elevator on the diffusion of cough droplet nuclei[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2022,(1):8-14. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20228305.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: