恩替卡韦序贯聚乙二醇化干扰素-α与单用恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效比较: 系统评价与分析
作者:
作者单位:

中南大学湘雅医院感染病科 病毒性肝炎湖南省重点实验室 国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心, 湖南 长沙 410008

作者简介:

通讯作者:

黄泽炳  E-mail: 36165934@qq.com

中图分类号:

+2]]>

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项(2018ZX10723203)


Comparison of clinical efficacy of entecavir-sequential Peg-IFN-α and entecavir alone for treatment for chronic hepatitis B: systematic evaluation and analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Infectious Diseases, Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis of Hunan Province, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 系统评价与分析恩替卡韦(ETV)序贯聚乙二醇化干扰素-α(Peg-IFN-α)与单用ETV在治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者中的临床疗效。 方法 计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方数据库,搜索有关ETV及ETV序贯Peg-IFN-α治疗慢性乙型肝炎的随机对照试验研究,应用Stata 16.0软件对符合纳入条件的临床研究进行系统评价与分析。 结果 共纳入10篇文献,1 250例患者,其中553例患者采用ETV序贯Peg-IFN-α治疗,697例患者单用ETV治疗,两组患者组间基线特征比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ETV序贯Peg-IFN-α试验组的HBsAg转换率、HBsAg清除率、HBeAg转换率、HBeAg清除率均高于ETV对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。 结论 在慢性乙型肝炎抗病毒治疗中,总体上ETV序贯Peg-IFN-α治疗疗效优于单用ETV。

    Abstract:

    Objective To systematically evaluate and analyze clinical efficacy of entecavir-sequential pegylated interferon-α (ETV-sequential Peg-IFN-α) and ETV alone for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods Randomized controlled trial on ETV and ETV-sequential Peg-IFN-α for treatment of CHB were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Construction (CNKI) and Wanfang database by computer, clinical studies that met the inclusion criterion were systematically evaluated and analyzed by Stata 16.0 software. Results A total of 10 literatures were included, involving 1 250 patients, 553 of whom were treated with ETV-sequential Peg-IFN-α, 697 patients were treated with ETV alone, there was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between two groups of patients (all P>0.05). HBsAg conversion rate, HBsAg clearance rate, HBeAg conversion rate and HBeAg clearance rate in ETV-sequential Peg-IFN-α trial group were all higher than those in ETV control group, differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Conclusion In the antiviral treatment of CHB, therapeutic effect of ETV-sequential Peg-IFN-α is better than that of ETV alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

郑洲松,黄宇琨,杨小丽,等.恩替卡韦序贯聚乙二醇化干扰素-α与单用恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎的临床疗效比较: 系统评价与分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2022,(11):1110-1117. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20222864.
Zhou-song ZHENG, Yu-kun HUANG, Xiao-li YANG, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy of entecavir-sequential Peg-IFN-α and entecavir alone for treatment for chronic hepatitis B: systematic evaluation and analysis[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2022,(11):1110-1117. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20222864.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: