两种储存柜对消化内镜管腔干燥的影响研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院消化内镜中心, 江苏 南京 210008;2.南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院感染管理办公室, 江苏 南京 210008

作者简介:

通讯作者:

李雯  E-mail: 1472118369@qq.com

中图分类号:

R187

基金项目:

江苏省重点研发计划(社会发展)项目(BE2021601)


Effect of two types of storage cabinets on lumen drying of digestive endoscope
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Digestive Endoscopy Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China;2.Infection Management Office, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究智能内镜储存柜和标准内镜储存柜在干燥消化内镜管腔中的价值。 方法 根据压力气枪对活检管腔充气的时间,将240条内镜分为30 s、40 s、50 s充气组,每组80条,充气结束后30 s、40 s、50 s充气组各排除已干燥内镜13、30、41条,将每组中干燥不合格的内镜采用随机数字法分为试验组和对照组,试验组放入智能内镜储存柜,对照组放入标准内镜储能柜,放置1、2、3、6、24 h采用水分测试法检测管腔是否含有残余液滴。 结果 30 s、40 s、50 s充气组内镜管腔干燥的合格率分别为16.25%、37.50%、51.25%,三组比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。充气组内镜在放入储存柜1、2、3、6 h后,智能柜与标准柜内镜管腔干燥合格率比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。再处理后的内镜放入智能柜中1 h即可达到所有内镜管腔干燥。30 s、40 s充气组内镜放置24 h时,智能柜和标准柜管腔干燥合格率比较,差异仍有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),50 s充气组内镜放置24 h时,智能柜和标准柜管腔干燥合格率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 智能柜有利于内镜管腔的快速干燥,降低微生物生长风险,值得推广应用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the value of intelligent endoscope storage cabinet and standard endoscope storage cabinet in drying digestive endoscope lumen. Methods 240 endoscopes were divided into 30 seconds (30 s), 40 s, and 50 s inflation groups according to the time required to inflate the biopsy lumen with pressure air gun, with 80 pieces in each group. After the completion of inflation, 13, 30, 41 pieces of dried endoscopes were excluded from the 30 s, 40 s, and 50 s inflation groups, drying unqualified endoscopes in each group were divided into trial group and control group by random number method, endoscopes in trial group and control group were placed in intelligent and standard endoscope storage cabinet respectively. When endoscopes were placed for 1, 2, 3, 6, and 24 hours, the moisture test was performed to detect whether the lumen contained residual droplets. Results The qualified rates of endoscopic lumen drying in 30 s, 40 s and 50 s inflation groups were 16.25%, 37.50% and 51.25% respectively, difference among three groups was significant (P < 0.05). After endoscopes in inflation groups were placed in the storage cabinet for 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours, there was significant difference in the qualified rate of endoscopic lumen drying between intelligent cabinet and standard cabinet (both P < 0.05). Lumen of all reprocessed endoscopes could achieve complete drying when endoscopes were placed in intelligent cabinet for 1 hour. When endoscopes in 30 s and 40 s inflation groups were placed for 24 hours, qualified rate of lumen drying between intelligent cabinet and standard cabinet was still significantly different (both P < 0.05), when endoscopes in 50 s inflation group were placed for 24 hours, qualified rate of lumen drying between intelligent cabinet and standard cabinet was no significantly different (both P>0.05). Conclusion Intelligent cabinet is beneficial to the rapid drying of endoscope lumen and reduces the risk of microbial growth, which is worthy of popularization and application.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

陈依莹,生媛,徐桂芳,等.两种储存柜对消化内镜管腔干燥的影响研究[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2022,(4):389-394. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20222239.
Yi-ying CHEN, Yuan SHENG, Gui-fang XU, et al. Effect of two types of storage cabinets on lumen drying of digestive endoscope[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2022,(4):389-394. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20222239.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-15
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: