2021年江苏省某市新型冠状病毒感染本土疫情中疑似采样点继发感染情况及采样策略评价
作者:
作者单位:

1.江苏省疾病预防控制中心急性传染病防制所, 江苏 南京 210009;2.江苏省疾病预防控制中心综合业务管理办公室, 江苏 南京 210009;3.江苏省疾病预防控制中心慢性传染病防制所, 江苏 南京 210009;4.扬州市疾病预防控制中心急性传染病防制所, 江苏 扬州 225007;5.江苏省疾病预防控制中心性病与艾滋病防制所, 江苏 南京 210009;6.江苏省疾病预防控制中心疫苗临床评价所, 江苏 南京 210009

作者简介:

通讯作者:

朱凤才  E-mail: jszfc@vip.sina.com

中图分类号:

R183

基金项目:

2019年新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)疫情数字精准防控技术研究计划类别项目: 社会发展-新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控科技应急公关项目(BE2020601)


Suspected secondary infection in nucleic acid sampling location and the evaluation of sampling strategy in the local SARS-CoV-2 infection outbreak in a City of Jiangsu Province
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Institute of the Prevention and Control of Acute Infectious Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China;2.Office of Integrated Affairs Management, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China;3.Institute of the Prevention and Control of Chronic Infectious Diseases, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China;4.Institute of the Prevention and Control of Acute Infectious Diseases, Yangzhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yangzhou 225007, China;5.Institue of Venereal Disease and AIDS Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China;6.Institute of Clinical Evaluation of Vaccines, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨新型冠状病毒(新冠病毒)感染疫情中疑似采样活动引发的新冠病毒继发感染等相关问题。 方法 2021年7—8月江苏省某市暴发新冠病毒Delta变异株本土疫情, 以此期间江苏省新冠病毒核酸检测系统中的检测信息为依据, 结合病例的流行病学史、实验室基因测序结果等, 筛选出疑似因采样活动引发继发新冠病毒感染的案例, 分析继发病例单次暴露与关联病例发病/首次检测阳性的时间间隔, 评估不同采样模式发生采样点继发新冠病毒感染的风险。 结果 共有8个采样点疑似发生新冠病毒继发感染, 涉及病例42例, 其中L村开展的大规模新冠病毒核酸检测活动涉及32例病例。42例继发新冠病毒感染病例中, 25例有明确感染来源并属于单次暴露感染, 分别在与关联病例发病前3、7 d, 关联病例首次检测阳性前0、1、3、4 d, 以及首次检测阳性后1 d发生单次暴露, 其中在关联病例首次检测阳性后1 d发生单次暴露的继发感染病例较多, 占64.0%(16/25)。不同采样模式发生采样点继发新冠病毒感染的风险为: 大规模人群集中采样>以街道或社区为单元的采样>入户采样。 结论 大规模人群集中采样发生采样点继发新冠病毒感染的风险较大, 其引起后续疫情传播和扩散的风险较大, 选择以街道或社区为单元的采样和入户采样的模式较优, 但做好采样现场秩序维护和个人防护仍是避免采样点继发新冠病毒感染的关键措施。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the suspected secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection caused by nucleic acid sampling activities during the epidemic of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods A local epidemic of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection broke out in a city in Jiangsu Province from July to August 2021. Based on the detection information in the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing information system of Jiangsu Province in this period, combined with the epidemiological history and laboratory genetic sequencing results of the patients, suspected cases of secondary infection caused by sampling activities were screened, and the time interval between onset/first positive test of associated cases and single exposure to secondary cases was calculated. Risks of secondary infection under different sampling modes at sampling locations were assessed. Results A total of 8 sampling locations were suspected of secondary infection, involving 42 cases, among which 32 cases had participated in large-scale nucleic acid sampling activities in village-L. Among the 42 cases of secondary SARS-CoV-2 infections, 25 had a clear infection source. Their single exposure with associated cases occurred 3 and 7 days before the onset of associated cases, 0, 1, 3, 4 days before and 1 day after the first positive test of associated cases, respectively. The majority of the single exposure occurred 1 day after the first positive test of associated cases, accounting for 64.0%(16/25). The risk of secondary infection at sampling locations under different sampling modes was: concentrated sampling of large-scale population >sampling based on streets or communities > door-to-door sampling. Conclusion The risk of secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection at centralized sampling location of large-scale population is relatively high, which increases the risk of subsequent transmission and spread of the epidemic. The sampling modes based on streets or communities and door-to-door sampling are preferred, but maintaining order at the sampling location and personal protection are still key measures to avoid secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection at the sampling location.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

张楠,沈雅,金广杰,等.2021年江苏省某市新型冠状病毒感染本土疫情中疑似采样点继发感染情况及采样策略评价[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2023,(5):581-585. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20233441.
Nan ZHANG, Ya SHEN, Guang-jie JIN, et al. Suspected secondary infection in nucleic acid sampling location and the evaluation of sampling strategy in the local SARS-CoV-2 infection outbreak in a City of Jiangsu Province[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2023,(5):581-585. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20233441.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-30
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: