湖南省HIV-1低病毒血症患者的生存质量及影响因素调查
作者:
作者单位:

1.南华大学公共卫生学院;2.湖南省疾病与预防控制中心性病与艾滋病防治科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

陈曦  E-mail: chenxi161@sohu.com

中图分类号:

R512.91

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项(2017ZX10201101002009)


Quality of life and its affecting factors of low-level viremia HIV-1 patients in Hunan Province
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China;2.Department of AIDS/STD Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha 410000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 了解湖南省艾滋病低病毒血症(low-level viremia,LLV)患者生存质量的影响因素,为艾滋病防治策略的制定提供依据。 方法 应用方便抽样的方式,采用自编的一般情况调查表和世界卫生组织生存质量测量简表(WHOQOL-HIV BREF)对44例LLV患者进行横断面调查,采用t检验、F检验、多元线性回归分析生存质量的影响因素。 结果 44例LLV人群中,男性29例(65.91%),45~59岁年龄组16例(36.36%),37例(84.09%)服药依从性较好,7例(15.91%)服药依从性差,存在漏服药物的情况。LLV患者生存质量总均分为(68.58±6.04)分,生理领域均分为(10.77±1.49)分。单因素分析显示,不同生活居住地、职业、月收入水平、是否出现药物不良反应患者的生理领域得分比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);多元线性回归分析显示不同文化程度(B心理=0.449,P心理=0.048;B环境=0.851,P环境=0.028)、月收入水平(B独立性=1.072,P独立性=0.006;B环境=0.989,P环境=0.026)、是否出现药物不良反应(B生理=-1.665,P生理=0.002)等是影响患者生存质量各领域的重要因素。 结论 LLV患者的生存质量得分较低,应更加重视文化程度低、收入水平低、出现药物不良反应的患者,改善其生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To understand the factors affecting the quality of life of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients with low-level viremia (LLV) in Hunan Province, and provide basis for the formulation of AIDS prevention and control strategies. Methods 44 LLV patients selected through convenient sampling were performed cross-sectional survey by the self-designed questionnaire for general information and World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire for HIV brief version (WHOQOL-HIV BREF). The affecting factors for the quality of life were analyzed by t-test, F-test and multiple linear regression. Results Among the 44 LLV patients, 29 (65.91%) were males, 16 (36.36%) were in the 45-59 years old group, 37 (84.09%) had good medication compliance, while 7 (15.91%) had poor medication compliance with missed medication administration. The overall score of quality of life for LLV patients was (68.58 ± 6.04) on average, and the average score in the physiological field was (10.77±1.49). Univariate analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences in scores in physiological field among patients with different living places, occupations, monthly income levels, and whether they had adverse drug reactions (all P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that different educational levels (Bpsychology=0.449, Ppsychology=0.048; Benvironment=0.851, Penvironment=0.028), monthly income level (Bindependence=1.072, Pindependence=0.006; Benvironment=0.989, Penvironment=0.026), and whether there were adverse drug reactions (Bphysiology=-1.665, Pphysiology=0.002) were important factors affecting various fields of patients' quality of life. Conclusion LLV patients have lower quality of life scores, and more attention should be paid to patients with low educational level, low income, and adverse drug reactions, so as to improve their quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

张王君,魏秀青,周珍红,等.湖南省HIV-1低病毒血症患者的生存质量及影响因素调查[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2023,(6):660-666. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234000.
Wang-jun ZHANG, Xiu-qing WEI, Zhen-hong ZHOU, et al. Quality of life and its affecting factors of low-level viremia HIV-1 patients in Hunan Province[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2023,(6):660-666. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234000.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-04
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: