多部门协作模式对提高血培养阳性率及降低抗菌药物使用强度的影响
作者:
作者单位:

1.广东省第二人民医院感染管理科;2.广东省第二人民医院检验医学科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

范翠琼  E-mail: 497950956@qq.com

中图分类号:

R197.323.4

基金项目:


Impact of multi-department collaboration mode on improving the positive rate of blood culture and reducing the intensity of antimicrobial use
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Infection Management Department, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510310, China;2.Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510310, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨采用多部门协作模式对提高血培养阳性率及降低抗菌药物使用强度的影响。 方法 选取2020年1—12月感染管理重点内科送检血培养的患者为研究对象,分析其血培养送检及抗菌药物使用情况。2020年1—6月为对照组,7—12月为干预组。2020年7月开始对血培养的送检模式实施干预措施。通过设置血培养标本平均送检时间等10个血培养相关质控指标,每月对重点科室进行考核,观察10个指标的改善情况。比较多部门协作管理模式干预前后,住院患者治疗性抗菌药物使用前血标本送检率、血培养送检方式、标本污染率及阳性率、抗菌药物使用率等情况。 结果 共送检血培养标本16 246瓶,其中对照组7 512瓶,干预组8 734瓶。干预组2套及以上送检比率(24.91%)高于对照组(15.04%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。干预组平均送检时间18.56 min(达到质控目标),平均上机时间18.83 min(达到质控目标),报阳结果平均报告临床科室时间148.28 min,未达到质控目标(≤1 h)。干预组的平均送检时间、上机时间、报阳结果报告临床科室时间的达标率均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。干预组血培养采集时机正确率(98.33% VS 74.67%)、采集方法正确率(82.67% VS 67.67%)、报阳临床科室处理正确率(70.67% VS 62.00%)均较对照组高,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预组血培养阳性率较对照组高(9.43% VS 6.56%);污染率较对照组低(0.77% VS 1.28%);不合格率较对照组低(1.19% VS 2.18%);差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预后重症医学科、血液科、感染科、神经内科的抗菌药物使用强度环比分别下降2.78%、42.36%、27.82%、39.47%,呼吸与危重症医学科环比上升8.10%。 结论 多部门协作模式对提高血培养阳性率、降低内科抗菌药物使用强度有较好作用。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the impact of multi-department collaboration mode on improving the positive rate of blood culture and reducing the intensity of antimicrobial use. Methods Patients who underwent blood culture in the key internal medicine departments for infection management from January to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. The blood culture and antimicrobial use were analyzed. Patients from January to June 2020 were the control group, while patients from July to December 2020 were the intervention group. Intervention measures for blood delivering were implemented starting in July 2020. Ten quality control indicators related to blood culture, such as the average delivering time of blood culture specimens, were set up to assess the key departments monthly, and the improvement of the 10 indicators were observed. Blood specimen delivering rate before antimicrobial use, blood culture delivering modes, specimen contamination rate and positive rate, as well as antimicrobial use rate of hospitalized patients before and after the intervention through multi-department collaboration management mode were compared. Results A total of 16 246 blood culture specimens were delivered for detection, including 7 512 in the control group and 8 734 in the intervention group. The delivering rate of two or more sets of blood delivering in the intervention group (24.91%) was higher than that in the control group (15.04%), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The average delivering time of the intervention group was 18.56 minutes (reaching the quality control goal), the average machine operation time was 18.83 minutes (reaching the quality control goal), and the average reporting time of positive results to clinical department was 148.28 minutes (not reaching the quality control goal, ≤1 hour). The average delivering time, machine operation time, and reporting time for positive results to clinical departments in the intervention group were all higher than those in the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (all P < 0.001). The accuracy rate of collection opportunity of blood culture (98.33% vs 74.67%), accuracy rate of blood collection method (82.67% vs 67.67%), and accuracy rate of correct treatment for clinical department with positive blood culture (70.67% vs 62.00%) in the intervention group were all higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The positive rate of blood culture in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group (9.43% vs 6.56%); the contamination rate was lower than that in the control group (0.77% vs 1.28%); the unqualified rate was lower than that of the control group (1.19% vs 2.18%), all the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). After the intervention, the antimicrobial use intensity in the intensive care medicine department, hematology department, infectious disease department, and the neurology department decreased by 2.78%, 42.36%, 27.82%, and 39.47%, respectively, while the pulmonary and critical care medicine department increased by 8.10%. Conclusion The multi-department collaboration mode has a good impact on improving the positive rate of blood culture and reducing the intensity of antimicrobial use in the internal medicine departments.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

李子焕,范翠琼,王恬,等.多部门协作模式对提高血培养阳性率及降低抗菌药物使用强度的影响[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2023,(7):816-821. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234125.
Zi-huan LI, Cui-qiong FAN, Tian WANG, et al. Impact of multi-department collaboration mode on improving the positive rate of blood culture and reducing the intensity of antimicrobial use[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2023,(7):816-821. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234125.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-04-28
  • 出版日期: