基于奥马环素治疗的临床疗效及影响因素分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R453.2

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学基金项目(2022JJ80045)


Analysis on clinical efficacy and influencing factors based on omadacycline treatment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨奥马环素治疗感染性疾病的临床疗效及治疗效果的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2022年1月—2023年12月在中南大学湘雅医院接受奥马环素单药或联合治疗的住院患者资料。通过单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析奥马环素治疗无效的影响因素。结果 共纳入160例患者,总体治疗有效率为69.4%(111例)。经奥马环素治疗后,观察到治疗有效组患者体温好转[(36.83±0.52)℃ VS (37.85±0.92)℃,P<0.001],白细胞计数[(7.78±4.07)×109/L VS (10.06±6.49)×109/L,P<0.001]、降钙素原[(0.63±1.19)ng/mL VS (4.43±10.14)ng/mL,P=0.001)]、C反应蛋白[(35.16±37.82) mg/L VS (105.08±99.47)mg/L,P<0.001]和天冬氨酸转氨酶[(50.50±40.04) U/L VS (77.17±91.43)U/L,P=0.004)]均显著下降。仅有1例患者出现腹泻等不良反应,但未中断治疗。 单因素分析显示:治疗无效组患者急性生理与慢性健康评分 (APACHE Ⅱ)[17.0(9.5~22.0) VS 12.0(9.0~19.0),P=0.046]和序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)[7.0(4.5~10.0) VS 4.0(2.0~9.0),P=0.019]更高。多因素分析显示:终末期肝病(OR=77.691,95%CI:5.448~1 107.880,P=0.001)、机械通气(OR=6.686,95%CI:1.628~27.452,P=0.008)及联合万古霉素治疗(OR=6.432,95%CI:1.891~21.874,P=0.003)是奥马环素治疗无效的危险因素;而奥马环素疗程(OR=0.905,95%CI:0.825~0.994,P=0.037)是治疗有效的保护因素。结论 奥马环素可作为难治性严重感染的替代疗法,不良反应较少,终末期肝病、机械通气、联合万古霉素治疗是感染患者奥马环素治疗无效的危险因素,足够的奥马环素疗程可改善患者的临床结局,亟待大样本的病例研究来证实该结论。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and influencing factors of omadacycline (OMC) in the treatment of patients with infectious diseases. Methods Data about hospitalized patients who received OMC monotherapy or combination therapy at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2022 to December 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The influencing factors for failure of OMC treatment was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 160 patients were included in analysis, with an overall effective treatment rate of 69.4% (n=111). After treatment with OMC, patients in effective group was observed that body temperature improved ([36.83±0.52]℃ vs [37.85±0.92]℃, P<0.001), white blood cell count ([7.78±4.07]×109/L vs [10.06±6.49]×109/L, P<0.001), procalcitonin ([0.63±1.19] ng/mL vs [4.43±10.14] ng/mL, P=0.001), C-reactive protein ([35.16±37.82] mg/L vs [105.08±99.47] mg/L, P<0.001), and aspartate aminotransferase ([50.50 ±40.04] U/L vs [77.17±91.43] U/L, P=0.004) all decreased significantly. Only one patient had adverse reactions such as diarrhea, but treatment was not interrupted. Univariate ana-lysis showed that patients in failure treatment group had a higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score (17.0 [9.5-22.0] vs 12.0 [9.0-19.0], P=0.046) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (7.0 [4.5-10.0] vs 4.0 [2.0-9.0], P=0.019). Multivariate analysis showed that end-stage liver disease (OR=77.691, 95%CI: 5.448-1 107.880, P=0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR=6.686, 95%CI: 1.628-27.452, P=0.008) and the combination treatment of vancomycin (OR=6.432, 95%CI: 1.891-21.874, P=0.003) were risk factors for the failure of OMC treatment, while the course of OMC treatment (OR=0.905, 95%CI: 0.825-0.994, P=0.037) was a protective factor for the effective treatment. Conclusion OMC can be used as an alternative therapy for refractory severe infection, with fewer adverse reaction. End-stage liver disease, mechanical ventilation and combination treatment of vancomycin are risk factors for failure of OMC treatment in infected patients. Adequate OMC treatment course can improve patients’ clinical outcome, large-scale case studies are needed to confirm the initial conclusion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

陈一帆,侯周华,胡琴,等.基于奥马环素治疗的临床疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2024,23(9):1106-1113. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20246447.
CHEN Yi-fan, HOU Zhou-hua, HU Qin, et al. Analysis on clinical efficacy and influencing factors based on omadacycline treatment[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2024,23(9):1106-1113. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20246447.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-30
  • 出版日期: 2024-09-28