北京市51所三级医院内镜超声微探头清洗消毒现状调查
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R197.323.4

基金项目:


Current status of cleaning and disinfection of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes in 51 tertiary hospitals in Beijing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 了解北京市三级医院内镜超声微探头清洗消毒现状。方法 采用便利抽样法抽取北京市51所三级医院,对内镜中心护士长进行问卷调查,调查内容包括内镜超声微探头预处理、清洗、消毒、灭菌、生物学检测、消毒追溯、储存维修等情况。结果 51所三级医院中甲等医院33所,乙等医院18所。76.47%(39所)的医院对使用后的超声微探头进行床旁预清洗,内镜超声微探头床旁预处理方式主要包括酶液湿巾擦拭(38.47%,15/39)和乙醇湿巾擦拭(30.77%,12/39);96.08%(49所)的医院对超声微探头进行手工清洗,手工清洗方法以"酶洗—擦洗—擦干"为主(58.82%,30所)。96.08%(49所)的医院对使用后的微探头进行消毒,以化学消毒剂浸泡消毒为主要方法(65.31%,32所);43.14%(22所)的医院对微探头进行灭菌,灭菌方法主要为0.2%~0.35%过氧乙酸浸泡10~15 min(77.27%,17/22);41.18%(21所)的医院定期对微探头进行生物学监测;37.25%(19所)的医院对微探头的清洗消毒流程进行追溯;88.24%(45所)的医院定期对微探头进行检查、保养、维修。结论 北京市51所三级医院对内镜超声微探头的预处理、清洗、消毒、灭菌及生物学监测情况存在较大差异,建议尽快制定相关专家共识或指南,从而规范内镜超声微探头的清洗消毒工作。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the current status of cleaning and disinfection of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes in tertiary hospitals in Beijing. Methods 51 tertiary hospitals in Beijing were selected with convenience sampling method, and a questionnaire survey was conducted on head nurses in endoscopy centers, the investigation included pre-treatment, cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, biological testing, disinfection traceability, storage and maintenance of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes. Results Among the 51 tertiary hospitals, 33 were first-class hospitals and 18 were second-class hospitals. 76.47% (n=39) of hospitals performed bed-side pre-cleaning on ultrasound microprobes after use, bed-side pre-treatment methods for endoscopic ultrasound microprobes mainly included enzyme solution wiping (38.47%, 15/39) and ethanol wiping (30.77%, 12/39); 96.08% (n=49) of hospitals performed manual cleaning for ultrasound microprobes, with "enzyme wash-scrub-dry" as the main method (58.82%, n=30); 96.08% (n=49) of hospitals disinfected microprobes after use, with chemical disinfectant immersion as the main methods (65.31%, n=32); 43.14% (n=22) of hospitals sterilized the microprobes, and the main method of sterilization was immersion in 0.2%-0.35% peroxyacetic acid for 10-15 minutes (77.27%, 17/22); 41.18% (n=21) of hospitals regularly conducted biological monitoring on microprobes; 37.25% (n=19) of hospitals traced the cleaning and disinfection process of microprobes; 88.24% (n=45) of hospitals regularly inspected, maintained, and repaired microprobes. Conclusion The pre-treatment, cleaning, disinfection, sterilization, and biological monitoring of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes in 51 tertiary hospitals in Beijing varies significantly, and it is recommended that a relevant expert consensus or guideline be formulated as early as possible, so as to standardize the cleaning and disinfection of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

郭新月,王依晗,秦一鸣,等.北京市51所三级医院内镜超声微探头清洗消毒现状调查[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2024,23(9):1157-1162. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20245186.
GUO Xin-yue, WANG Yi-han, QIN Yi-ming, et al. Current status of cleaning and disinfection of endoscopic ultrasound microprobes in 51 tertiary hospitals in Beijing[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2024,23(9):1157-1162. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20245186.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-30
  • 出版日期: 2024-09-28