Comparison of sampling results of different sampling and inoculation methods on the surface of different materials
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Center for Healthcare-associated Infection Control, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China;2.Department of Healthcare-associated Infection Ma-nagement, Maternity and Child Care Center of Dezhou, Dezhou 253015, China;3.Department of Healthcare-associated Infection Control, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China;4.Department of Healthcare-associated Infection Management, Traditional Chinese Hospital of Luan, Luan 237000, China;5.Department of Healthcare-associated Infection Control, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Chuxiong 675000, China

Clc Number:

R446.5

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the detection efficiency of different sampling methods to detect bacterial contamination on the surface of different materials, and explore a sampling method that not only conforms to national standards, but also can simply, quickly and accurately reflect the actual microbial contamination on object surface. Methods Surface of sterilized stainless steel plate and sterilized non-woven fabric were evenly coated with Staphylococcus saprophyticus, after natural drying, object surface were taken samples and detected the total number of bacterial colonies by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay, cotton swab smearing method, carrier imprinting method, and membrane filtration method, differences in different sampling methods were compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 software. Results Under different contamination concentrations, stainless steel plates and non-woven fabrics had the highest number of bacteria detected by carrier imprinting method, followed by membrane filtration method, while cotton swab smearing method had the lowest number of detected bacteria. When bacterial colonies of non-woven fabric was 106 CFU/mL, the qualified rate of carrier imprinting method (30.0%) was lower than that of cotton swab smearing method (80.0%), membrane filtration method (80.0%) and ATP bioluminescence assay (90.0%), differences were all statistically significant (all P < 0.05). ATP bioluminescence assay was prone to get false negative results. When bacterial concentration was 107 CFU/mL, Pearson correlation coefficient between cotton swab smearing method and ATP bioluminescence assay was 0.838 (P=0.002), detection results of two sampling methods had good correlation. Conclusion Carrier imprinting method is more sensitive than cotton swab smearing method, membrane filtration method and ATP bioluminescence assay for the detection of bacterial colonies contaminated on object surface, carrier imprinting method can be used for the monitoring of bacteria on environmental object surface and hands in medical institutions; ATP bioluminescence assay and cotton swab smearing method have a good correlation to the detection results of bacterial load on artificially contaminated non-woven fabric surface.

    Reference
    Related
Get Citation

高园,刘婷,张卫东,等.环境物体表面不同采样与接种方法在不同材料表面采样结果比较[J].中国感染控制杂志英文版,2022,(1):86-91. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20228280.
Yuan GAO, Ting LIU, Wei-dong ZHANG, et al. Comparison of sampling results of different sampling and inoculation methods on the surface of different materials[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2022,(1):86-91. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20228280.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:February 26,2021
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: April 28,2024
  • Published: